Advertisement
Contact us for information and rates.

Home > ...
Enter your email address to join our mailing list and receive our weekly newsletters:

Views / Predictions for 2009
2009 Prediction

image By Jeffrey Inaba
Jeffrey Inaba heads LA-based Inaba Projects. He is also the Director of C-Lab and Features Editor of Volume.

Bad news: in the coming year we will probably be broadsided by another crisis (a flu pandemic, worldwide crop disease, global sequence of ‘Big One’ earthquakes, cyber meltdown or extended civil protest) which will worsen the collapsing world economy, setting into motion a domino effect of operational failures that will to lead systematic breakdowns of infrastructure and services in urban centers.

Good news: sometimes a plan hatched for one problem works even better for another. The Urban Prosperity plan proposed by the US president-elect is billed as an initiative for market recovery. It is intended to “stimulate economic activity” through federally funded programs by improving urban areas. This plan seems even more apt to implement should another crisis occur. There won’t be a need to stop and redraw its scope since what it outlines is what would be needed in the case of a double-whammy.

Though it is packaged as a recovery plan it is really a new cities plan. In its most immediate sense it seeks to improve the depressed economy through urban development: to prop up markets by creating jobs to build infrastructure, transportation systems, public facilities like libraries and schools and to implement clean building technologies. But the plan is more ambitious and far reaching. It does more than try to improve cities as a means to an end, it aims to transform what cities are. Instead of calling for maintenance repairs and incremental upgrading, it looks to make a new kind of living environment where cities operate efficiently at a regional (rather than municipal) scale with advanced forms of collective transportation and sustainable infrastructure systems. The declaration of such a plan in itself expands the horizon of possibilities for what we as architects can design, and more importantly, it offers a historically unique opportunity for a developed nation to have a second chance to make a smart form of city. Hopefully, it won’t come down to an additional series catastrophic of events to realize such a plan. But it probably will.
Comment...


Notify me when someone adds a comment?

The Views section is reserved for the publication of opinions from Archinect, its members, and invited guests.
2009 Predictions...
2009 Prediction
by Barry Lehrman
5 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Benjamin Ball
4 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Bryan Boyer
6 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Dan Hill
2 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Donna Sink
5 comment(s)
The Future, Circa 1931
by Enrique Ramirez
5 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Evan Geisler
5 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Fred Scharmen
5 comment(s)
Foreclosing cities
by Javier Arbona
6 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Jeffrey Inaba
0 comment(s)
Predictions for 2009. In Point Form!
by Marcus Trimble
0 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Markus Miessen
0 comment(s)
2009, it’s going to be ugly.
by Michiel van Raaij
4 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Nam Henderson
4 comment(s)
2009 Prediction
by Nick Sowers
0 comment(s)
2009: A Year of Critical Activism?
by Quilian Riano
4 comment(s)